Keyword Analysis & Research: holter monitor vs zio patch

Keyword Analysis


Keyword CPC PCC Volume Score Length of keyword
holter monitor vs zio patch0.010.898301127
holter1.660.86433446
monitor0.360.78144567
vs0.560.57691882
zio1.990.84229453
patch1.491264525

Keyword Research: People who searched holter monitor vs zio patch also searched

Keyword CPC PCC Volume Score
holter monitor vs zio patch0.740.6697228

Search Results related to holter monitor vs zio patch on Search Engine

  • Wearable Devices for Ambulatory Cardiac Monitoring: Review

    acc.org

    https://www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiology/ten-points-to-remember/2020/03/30/12/17/wearable-devices-for-ambulatory-cardiac

    WEBApr 3, 2020 · The Zio patch provides a single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and is used for continuous monitoring of cardiac rhythm. Due to the extended monitoring time of up to 14 days, the Zio device has a higher diagnostic yield than the Holter monitor.

    DA: 95 PA: 57 MOZ Rank: 50

  • Comparison of 24-hour Holter monitoring with 14-day novel …

    irhythmtech.com

    https://www.irhythmtech.com/providers/evidence/barrett-holter-vs-zio

    WEBMcNemar’s tests were used to compare the matched pairs of data from the Holter and the adhesive patch monitor. Results. Over the total wear time of both devices, the adhesive patch monitor detected 96 arrhythmia events compared with 61 arrhythmia events by the Holter monitor (P < .001). Conclusions

    DA: 50 PA: 27 MOZ Rank: 28

  • Wireless ZIO Patch vs. Holter Monitor | Smart Telecardiology

    smarttelecardiology.com

    https://smarttelecardiology.com/blog/wireless-zio-patch-vs-holter-monitor

    WEBThe ZIO patch may enable more effective diagnosis, which could ultimately save more lives. The wearable ZIO Patch beats the Holter Monitor in detecting cardiac arrhythmias. Learn more from the Holter reporting team at Smart Telecardiology.

    DA: 87 PA: 55 MOZ Rank: 36

  • Comparison of Holter With Zio Patch Electrocardiography Monitoring …

    ajconline.org

    https://www.ajconline.org/article/S0002-9149(19)31352-9/fulltext

    WEBDec 10, 2019 · In conclusion, the Zio patch is as good as the Holter monitor in detection of clinically significant arrhythmias in children with less artifact. Importantly, patients/parents more often preferred the Zio over the Holter.

    DA: 82 PA: 34 MOZ Rank: 51

  • Cardiac Event Monitor: Types and Uses - Cleveland Clinic

    clevelandclinic.org

    https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diagnostics/23272-cardiac-event-monitor

    WEBCardiac event monitor vs. Holter monitor. If you’re having frequent symptoms, your provider will ask you to use a Holter monitor, which is a device that records your heart rhythm continuously for 24 to 48 hours. If your provider gets enough information from the Holter monitor to diagnose you, you won’t need to try a cardiac event monitor.

    DA: 55 PA: 15 MOZ Rank: 47

  • What You Should Know About Ambulatory ECG Monitoring

    verywellhealth.com

    https://www.verywellhealth.com/ambulatory-ecg-monitoring-4171275

    WEBOct 11, 2022 · A patch monitor stores all a person’s heartbeats during that time and employs arrhythmia detectors that can transmit an ECG wirelessly if a cardiac arrhythmia occurs. The two most commonly used patch monitors are the Zio patch (iRhythm) and the SEEQ patch (Medtronic).

    DA: 67 PA: 8 MOZ Rank: 86

  • Why Zio | iRhythm

    irhythmtech.com

    https://www.irhythmtech.com/patients/why-zio

    WEBZio vs. Holter monitoring. The Zio monitor can be comfortably worn for up to 14 days. Holter monitors can be worn for 24 to 48 hours, limiting the time to record any irregular heart rhythms you may have. Zio is able to capture data for the 51% of patients who have their first symptom-triggered arrhythmia after 48 hours. 1. 1 Turakhia, M., et al ...

    DA: 39 PA: 99 MOZ Rank: 23

  • COMPARISON OF HOLTER WITH PATCH AMBULATORY …

    jacc.org

    https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/S0735-1097%2819%2931215-X

    WEBMar 16, 2019 · The Zio patch is as good as the Holter monitor in detecting clinically significant arrhythmias in children. Patients more often preferred the Zio compared to the Holter.

    DA: 47 PA: 23 MOZ Rank: 97

  • Comparison of 24-hour Holter Monitoring with 14-day Novel …

    nih.gov

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3882198/

    WEBThe Zio Patch is an FDA-cleared, noninvasive continuous ambulatory ECG adhesive monitoring patch that is less cumbersome to wear than a conventional 24-hour Holter monitor. With 93.7% of patients finding the adhesive patch monitor comfortable to wear and 81% indicating they would prefer it over the Holter monitor, it is clearly a less-obtrusive ...

    DA: 43 PA: 20 MOZ Rank: 63

  • Novel Wireless Devices for Cardiac Monitoring | Circulation

    ahajournals.org

    https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.009024

    WEBAug 12, 2014 · A recent trial of the 14-day Zio Patch monitor compared with conventional 24-Holter monitor showed that the Zio Patch detected 57% more (96 versus 61 events; P <0.001) significant clinical events than the conventional Holter. 6 The majority of study participants (81%) preferred the Zio patch to conventional …

    DA: 27 PA: 15 MOZ Rank: 30