| Keyword | CPC | PCC | Volume | Score | Length of keyword |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| jacs journal impact factor | 1.74 | 0.4 | 1228 | 83 | 26 |
| jacs | 0.96 | 0.5 | 304 | 78 | 4 |
| journal | 0.13 | 0.8 | 6916 | 19 | 7 |
| impact | 0.21 | 0.1 | 5163 | 2 | 6 |
| factor | 1.07 | 1 | 5368 | 32 | 6 |
| Keyword | CPC | PCC | Volume | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| jacs journal impact factor | 1.28 | 0.6 | 7943 | 89 |
| jacc journal impact factor | 0.45 | 0.6 | 7795 | 19 |
| jacs impact factor history | 0.37 | 0.9 | 3579 | 4 |
| impact factor jacs au | 0.19 | 0.4 | 5035 | 55 |
| jacs communication impact factor | 0.45 | 0.2 | 5983 | 12 |
| jacs impact factor 2022 | 1.81 | 1 | 8462 | 92 |
| jacs impact factor 2020 | 1.78 | 0.5 | 1220 | 80 |
| jaci journal impact factor | 0.71 | 1 | 2002 | 70 |
| jacs au impact factor prediction | 1.74 | 0.5 | 478 | 3 |
| jacs impact factor 2021 | 1.68 | 0.8 | 9663 | 39 |
| aocs journal impact factor | 1.41 | 0.4 | 5206 | 97 |
| jacs au impact factor 2021 | 0.76 | 0.3 | 1087 | 54 |
| jacs au impact factor 2020 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 5416 | 42 |
| jacc advances impact factor | 0.8 | 0.9 | 4554 | 95 |
| jas reports impact factor | 1.8 | 0.7 | 1473 | 83 |
| jacs gold impact factor | 1.56 | 0.6 | 8941 | 16 |
| jci journal impact factor | 1.17 | 0.3 | 7168 | 68 |
| jacc oncology impact factor | 1.74 | 0.4 | 7011 | 12 |
| jacs journal of the american chemical society | 0.87 | 0.3 | 8350 | 33 |
| clinical jasn impact factor | 1.07 | 0.6 | 2038 | 93 |
| jacs papers this week | 0.42 | 0.5 | 6990 | 8 |
Journal Impact Factor (JIF) or Impact Factor (IF) of an academic journal is a measure, calculated by the yearly average number of citations to recent articles published in that particular journal.This article explains how to find the impact factor of a journal in detail. Impact Factor is the more valuable parameter among the academicians, in order to select the journal for publication.
Does journal impact factor really matter?Why does impact factor matter? The emphasis on journal impact factor is controversial within the scientific community. As discussed in Nature, this controversy stems from the concern that impact factor may not adequately capture journal quality or influence and could contribute to an “unhealthy research culture” aimed at improving impact factors.
