shelby county v. holder | Shelby County v. Holder

Keyword	CPC	PCC	Volume	Score	Length of keyword
shelby county v. holder	0.15	0.4	1143	29	23
shelby	0.2	0.2	542	64	6
county	1.18	1	5069	6	6
v.	1.49	0.3	9850	78	2
holder	1.75	0.2	911	25	6

Keyword	CPC	PCC	Volume	Score
shelby county v. holder	0.29	0.4	8025	67

Search Results related to shelby county v. holder on Search Engine

Shelby County v. Holder | Oyez
oyez.org

https://www.oyez.org/cases/2012/12-96

WebShelby County, Alabama, filed suit in district court and sought both a declaratory judgment that Section 5 and Section 4(b) are unconstitutional and a permanent injunction against their enforcement. The district court upheld the constitutionality of the Sections and granted summary judgment for the Attorney General. ... "Shelby County v. Holder ...

DA: 56 PA: 58 MOZ Rank: 83

SHELBY COUNTY v. HOLDER | Supreme Court | US Law | LII / …
cornell.edu

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/12-96

WebJun 25, 2013 · Petitioner Shelby County, in the covered jurisdiction of Alabama, sued the Attorney General in Federal District Court in Washington, D. C., seeking a declaratory judgment that sections 4 (b) and 5 are facially unconstitutional, as well as a permanent injunction against their enforcement.

DA: 97 PA: 41 MOZ Rank: 83

Shelby County v. Holder | Brennan Center for Justice
brennancenter.org

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/court-cases/shelby-county-v-holder

WebAug 4, 2018 · On June 25, 2013, the Supreme Court swept away a key provision of this landmark civil rights law in Shelby County v. Holder. Last Updated: June 25, 2023. Published: August 4, 2018. Click here for more on the effects of Shelby County v. Holder on the Voting Rights Act >>.

DA: 43 PA: 1 MOZ Rank: 93

Shelby County v. Holder - Wikipedia
wikipedia.org

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelby_County_v._Holder

WebShelby County v. Holder, 570 U.S. 529 (2013), was a landmark decision [1] of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the constitutionality of two provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965: Section 5, which requires certain states and local governments to obtain federal preclearance before implementing any changes to their voting laws ...

DA: 99 PA: 98 MOZ Rank: 79

Shelby County v. Holder | Constitution Center
constitutioncenter.org

https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/supreme-court-case-library/shelby-county-v-holder

WebIn Shelby County v. Holder, the Supreme Court assessed whether this feature of the VRA was constitutional under Congress’s power to “enforce” the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments, which prohibit racially discriminatory voting practices.

DA: 2 PA: 76 MOZ Rank: 98

Shelby County v. Holder | Voting Rights Act, Supreme Court
britannica.com

https://www.britannica.com/event/Shelby-County-v-Holder

WebJun 25, 2013 · Shelby County v. Holder, legal case, decided on June 25, 2013, in which the U.S. Supreme Court declared (5–4) unconstitutional Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) of 1965, which set forth a formula for determining which jurisdictions were required (under Section 5 of the act) to seek federal.

DA: 27 PA: 8 MOZ Rank: 71

Shelby County v. Holder - SCOTUSblog
scotusblog.com

https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/shelby-county-v-holder/

WebFeb 27, 2013 · Shelby County v. Holder : Bad behavior by DOJ contributes to the fall of Section 5 (Christian Adams, February 12, 2013) Holder : Reasons to believe (Michael Pitts, February 11, 2013)

DA: 98 PA: 45 MOZ Rank: 97

The Effects of Shelby County v. Holder - Brennan Center for Justice
brennancenter.org

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/effects-shelby-county-v-holder

WebAug 6, 2018 · The ruling rendered the Section 5 preclearance system effectively inoperable. The decision in Shelby County opened the floodgates to laws restricting voting throughout the United States. The effects were immediate. Within 24 hours of the ruling, Texas announced that it would implement a strict photo ID law.

DA: 18 PA: 16 MOZ Rank: 78

Shelby County v. Holder - LII / Legal Information Institute
cornell.edu

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/12-96

WebCourt below: United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. In 2006, Congress reauthorized the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (“VRA”) for 25 years. Section 5 of the VRA requires certain “covered” jurisdictions to obtain federal preclearance before making any alterations to their election laws.

DA: 24 PA: 14 MOZ Rank: 13

Shelby County v. Holder | American Civil Liberties Union
aclu.org

https://www.aclu.org/cases/shelby-county-v-holder

WebJan 16, 2014 · Give. Court Cases ›. Shelby County v. Holder. Voting Rights. Court Type: U.S. Supreme Court. Status: Closed (Judgment) Last Update: January 16, 2014. What's at Stake. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 is one of our …

DA: 80 PA: 3 MOZ Rank: 49